Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 05:57
Thank you.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
This overlooked cause of PTSD is only going to get worse - vox.com
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
How often do you watch the news on TV?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
What’s next?
How do I make an instrumental version of a Hindi song?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What was your best experience of having your navel touched?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Which is the worst Bollywood movie you have ever seen and why?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Why do I get stressed when I go to bed?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Newspaper headlines: 'A generation let down' and 'Israel claims control' - BBC
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
CrowdStrike Swings to Loss as Expenses From Last Summer’s Outage Persist - WSJ